Wednesday, June 5, 2013

Kurt Vonnegut to Charles McCarthy

In October of 1973, Bruce Severy — a 26-year-old English teacher at Drake High School, North Dakota — decided to use Kurt Vonnegut's novel, 'Slaughterhouse-Five', as a teaching aid in his classroom. The next month, on November 7th, the head of the school board, Charles McCarthy, demanded that all 32 copies be burned in the school's furnace as a result of its "obscene language." Other books soon met with the same fate. On the 16th of November, Kurt Vonnegut sent McCarthy the following letter. He didn't receive a reply.
November 16, 1973

Dear Mr. McCarthy:  
 
I am writing to you in your capacity as chairman of the Drake School Board. I am among those American writers whose books have been destroyed in the now famous furnace of your school.

I want you to know, too, that my publisher and I have done absolutely nothing to exploit the disgusting news from Drake. We are not clapping each other on the back, crowing about all the books we will sell because of the news. We have declined to go on television, have written no fiery letters to editorial pages, have granted no lengthy interviews. We are angered and sickened and saddened. And no copies of this letter have been sent to anybody else. You now hold the only copy in your hands. It is a strictly private letter from me to the people of Drake, who have done so much to damage my reputation in the eyes of their children and then in the eyes of the world. Do you have the courage and ordinary decency to show this letter to the people, or will it, too, be consigned to the fires of your furnace?

I gather from what I read in the papers and hear on television that you imagine me, and some other writers, too, as being sort of ratlike people who enjoy making money from poisoning the minds of young people. I am in fact a large, strong person, fifty-one years old, who did a lot of farm work as a boy, who is good with tools. I have raised six children, three my own and three adopted. They have all turned out well. Two of them are farmers. I am a combat infantry veteran from World War II, and hold a Purple Heart. I have earned whatever I own by hard work. I have never been arrested or sued for anything. I am so much trusted with young people and by young people that I have served on the faculties of the University of Iowa, Harvard, and the City College of New York. Every year I receive at least a dozen invitations to be commencement speaker at colleges and high schools. My books are probably more widely used in schools than those of any other living American fiction writer.

If you were to bother to read my books, to behave as educated persons would, you would learn that they are not sexy, and do not argue in favor of wildness of any kind. They beg that people be kinder and more responsible than they often are. It is true that some of the characters speak coarsely. That is because people speak coarsely in real life. Especially soldiers and hardworking men speak coarsely, and even our most sheltered children know that. And we all know, too, that those words really don’t damage children much. They didn’t damage us when we were young. It was evil deeds and lying that hurt us.

If you and your board are now determined to show that you in fact have wisdom and maturity when you exercise your powers over the eduction of your young, then you should acknowledge that it was a rotten lesson you taught young people in a free society when you denounced and then burned books–books you hadn’t even read. You should also resolve to expose your children to all sorts of opinions and information, in order that they will be better equipped to make decisions and to survive.


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2013.
An Initiative of IIPM, Malay Chaudhuri
For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles

Monday, June 3, 2013

One for the road! A practice discouraged

India’s ambitious highway development programme lies in a shambles. With major developers pulling out of projects and a few takers due to severe liquidity crunch, the lifeline for India’s economic development is on life support. By Parimal Peeyush

That highways is the lifeline of a developing country is common sense. These roads not only provide the most cost-effective mode of transport, but connect capitals, ports and places of strategic importance and are crucial for trade and commerce. Any government with the basic desire to fuel economic growth would put in place an efficient network of roads on its list of top priorities.

The India story under the ruling UPA II however reads different. Considered to be the most important sector of India’s infrastructure after power, the highways sector lies in absolute shambles. Against its ambitious target of awarding 9,500 km of road length of projects during FY2012-13, the government, through the National Highway Authority of India (NHAI), had managed only 837 km until January 2013.

Earlier this year, two major developers – GMR Highways (a subsidiary of GMR Infra), and GVK Power & Infrastructure pulled the plug on two high-profile road projects collectively worth more than Rs.100 billion. The two projects included GMR’s Rs.77 billion Kishangarh-Udaipur-Ahmedabad project and GVK’s Rs.30 billion Shivpuri-Dewas project in Madhya Pradesh. The exits, as per official statements released by the companies, was fuelled by delays in getting mandatory environmental and forest clearances and issues in land acquisitions. Several other firms who had won contracts with the NHAI for highway development too are either struggling for want of bank loans or are stuck in contractual disputes.

Last year, the NHAI had drawn some serious flak from the Comptroller & Auditor General (CAG) for a potential loss of Rs.8.74 billion on account of delays in completion of projects that were meant to connect major ports through highways. The authority also incurred a revenue loss of over Rs.1.27 billion on account of delays in setting up Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs), the report said, adding that while five of the Rs.31.57 billion projects were incomplete, four saw delays of up to 53 months. “Potential loss of toll revenue, due to delay in completion of PRC projects, worked out to Rs.8.74 billion,” the CAG said in its report tabled in Parliament.

“Investment in road sector has collapsed in FY2012-13, with scant interest in new projects, large delays and poor execution in existing projects,” RBI too said in its macroeconomic review for Q4, 2012. As per the central bank, almost half of the 563 central government infrastructure projects of Rs.1.50 billion and above were facing delays, with a majority of the projects in power and roads sectors. As a result, banks have also become extremely wary and developers are finding it extremely difficult to secure bank loans, which are essential for financing such big-ticket projects.

NHAI Chairman R. P. Singh, however, contests the fact that delays in clearances and disputes have forced developers to quit. “Basically, in our view, as to why they are walking out of these two projects is the change in economic scenario and escalation of cost,” Singh said, while adding that arranging huge private equity is a major problem. As per RBI, the GVK project requires an equity of Rs.15 billion, while that of GMR requires Rs.20 billion. Clearly, the companies have found it impossible to raise the required funds. Singh added that NHAI sympathises with the two major players but was not ready to accept the reasons for termination of contracts as the same are “not tenable”. No stranger to being at the receiving end for project delays, Environment Minister Jayanthi Natarajan denied allegations that delays in getting a green nod is holding up road projects and said there was no delay “even for a day” in granting clearances. Sources, however, inform the magazine that about 20 highway projects are awaiting clearance from the Ministry of Environment & Forests.

“The road construction sector has reached a certain level of maturity. But it faces challenges... Hence, the government has decided to constitute a regulatory authority for the road sector,” said Finance Minister P. Chidambaram in his recent budget speech. The FM further stated that bottlenecks stalling road projects have been addressed and 3,000 km of road projects in Gujarat, MP, Maharashtra, Rajasthan and UP will be awarded in the first six months of FY2013-14. While the FM expects Rs.55,000 billion investment in infrastructure during the 12th Five-Year plan, and 47% of it from the private sector, companies are not as confident. Reason being that many infrastructure investments are stuck at various stages of approvals due to regulatory hurdles.

On its part, the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways (MoRTH) has finalised a proposal for awarding projects under a modified engineering procurement and construction (EPC) mode. “To overcome the economic slowdown in this sector, MoRTH has finalised a proposal for awarding projects under new modified turnkey EPC mode under 100% government funding in cases where there are no takers under BOT (toll) mode,” said the Economic Survey 2012-13, tabled in Parliament. This mode of delivery will also take care of cost and time overruns and the ministry has pinned all its hopes on the EPC mode. Under the EPC model, the government spends the entire money required to build roads so as to attract builders who are shying away from highways projects for want of funds. The Survey also suggests easing exit norms for developers. Detailing steps to boost the sector, it said the NHAI Board has approved formation of an expert settlement advisory committee for one-time settlement of old cases pending in courts.


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2013.
An Initiative of IIPM, Malay Chaudhuri
For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles
IIPM’s Management Consulting Arm-Planman Consulting
Professor Arindam Chaudhuri – A Man For The Society….
IIPM: Indian Institute of Planning and Management
IIPM makes business education truly global
Management Guru Arindam Chaudhuri
Rajita Chaudhuri-The New Age Woman

ExecutiveMBA

Sunday, June 2, 2013

So what ails the Yamuna?

And why is NRCD not being pulled up immediately?

For those who may not know, NRCD stands for the National River Conservation Directorate. Perhaps the hidden nature of the directorate is more deliberate than by chance, as in all the brouhaha surrounding the recent furore on the increasing pollution in Yamuna, there was not even a ghost of a mention of NRCD, a body which technically should be the one being pulled up for destroying – through the lack of sustained action plans – whatever was left of the Yamuna. More amusing is the fact that NRCD, which is supposedly heading the Yamuna Action Plan, comes under Ministry of Environment and Forests rather than the Ministry of Water Sources.

It was the Supreme Court which first ordered a scrutiny on the pollution levels of the river 19 years ago and directed the Yamuna Action Plan in1993. However, reports by prominent agencies (Center for Science and Environment, MIT and others) including the recent SC reviews, reveal that the river remains as dead and polluted as usual in spite of the last two decades' effort and massive investments of Rs.6,500 crore to clean the river.

Inadequate capacity of sewage treatment, inefficiency of fund utilisation and delayed project implementation worsened the condition severally. A report submitted to the SC by an inspection team highlighted that “Delhi's 17 Sewage Treatment Plants (STPs) have a capacity of 2,460 MGD against a utilization of 1,558 MGD” where the city generates sewage around 3,800 MGD. In the same line, the Delhi Jal Board’s inceptor sewers project (to treat sewage before it flows into major drains) became a major failure as it was just able to spend only Rs.51 crore of the Rs.1,963 crore allocated. Sadly, apart from the inceptor scheme, the whole budget to restore Yamuna has simply gone down the drain since 1993. Over time, Uttar Pradesh, Haryana and Delhi have spent around Rs.2,052 crore, Rs.2,084 and Rs.2,394 crore respectively. The YAP First Phase had to be accomplished by 2000 but was delayed by three years. And the proposed inceptor project would be completed by 2014 instead of 2012.

So who should be pulled up? The IIPM Think Tank has regularly argued that randomly hitting whichever departmental spokesperson walks into the court is no solution. The NRCD should be necessarily broken down into sister organisations, with one organisation heading the management of each river of national importance.


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2013.
An Initiative of IIPM, Malay Chaudhuri
For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles
IIPM’s Management Consulting Arm-Planman Consulting
Professor Arindam Chaudhuri – A Man For The Society….
IIPM: Indian Institute of Planning and Management
IIPM makes business education truly global
Management Guru Arindam Chaudhuri
Rajita Chaudhuri-The New Age Woman

ExecutiveMBA

Friday, May 31, 2013

Henry Miller to Anais Nin

In 1932, months after first meeting in Paris and despite both being married, Cuban diarist Anaïs Nin and hugely influential novelist Henry Miller began an incredibly intense love affair that would last for many years and, along the way, generate countless passionate love letters. Below is one of the most powerful examples, written by Miller in August of 1932 shortly after a visit to Nin's home in Louveciennes.

August 14, 1932

Anais:

Don't expect me to be sane anymore. Don't let's be sensible. It was a marriage at Louveciennes – you can't dispute it. I came away with pieces of you sticking to me; I am walking about, swimming, in an ocean of blood, your Andalusian blood, distilled and poisonous. Everything I do and say and think relates back to the marriage. I saw you as the mistress of your home, a Moor with a heavy face, a negress with a white body, eyes all over your skin, woman, woman, woman. I can't see how I can go on living away from you – these intermissions are death. How did it seem to you when Hugo came back? I can't picture you moving about with him as you did with me. Legs closed. Frailty. Sweet, treacherous acquiescence. Bird docility. You became a woman with me. I was almost terrified by it. You are not just thirty years old – you are a thousand years old.

Here I am back and still smouldering with passion, like wine smoking. Not a passion any longer for flesh, but a complete hunger for you, a devouring hunger. I read the paper about suicides and murders and I understand it all thoroughly. I feel murderous, suicidal. I feel somehow that it is a disgrace to do nothing, to just bide one's time, to take it philosophically, to be sensible. Where has gone the time when men fought, killed, died for a glove, a glance, etc? (A victrola is playing that terrible aria from Madama Butterfly – "Some day he'll come!")

Anais, I only thought I loved you before; it was nothing like this certainty that's in me now. Was all this so wonderful only because it was brief and stolen? Were we acting for each other, to each other? Was I less I, or more I, and you less or more you? Is it madness to believe that this could go on? When and where would the drab moments begin? I study you so much to discover the possible flaws, the weak points, the danger zones. I don't find them – not any. That means I am in love, blind, blind. To be blind forever! (Now they're singing "Heaven and Ocean" from La Gioconda.)


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2013.
An Initiative of IIPM, Malay Chaudhuri
For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles
IIPM’s Management Consulting Arm-Planman Consulting
Professor Arindam Chaudhuri – A Man For The Society….
IIPM: Indian Institute of Planning and Management
IIPM makes business education truly global
Management Guru Arindam Chaudhuri
Rajita Chaudhuri-The New Age Woman

ExecutiveMBA

"If militancy and gun culture resurface in Kashmir, responsibility is India's"

The oldest surviving hardline separatist, Syed Ali Shah Geelani, after being released after a 19-day house arrest in New Delhi following the execution of Afzal Guru, tells Aditya Raj Kaul in an exclusive interview that India should be prepared for the consequences of the hanging.

What was your first reaction to Afzal Guru’s hanging?
Afzal sahab was hanged at February 9 at 9 am; Delhi Police personnel in large numbers entered my room. Lady constables were made to sit in the next room. The male police officers were in my room. There was no formal document or an able officer who could explain why I was being kept under house arrest. They probably thought that after Afzal’s martyrdom, I will fly to Srinagar to be a part of the protests which would follow. My intention was indeed to return to Kashmir, which they anticipated quickly. For 19 days, I was kept locked in these two rooms. Most painfully, for the first 32 hours, the security personnel did not even leave my room, neither was I allowed to go out. Even when I prepared for the Friday prayers, I was not allowed to go. It was a Congress decision in haste. They did not apply their minds. BJP wanted Afzal to be hanged and the Congress played along, thinking they could use it as ploy against the main opposition party in the upcoming elections. That is why they hung Afzal, without leaking any information. It was a judicial and a political murder. Afzal himself was not part of the group which attacked the Indian Parliament. All the attackers were killed on the spot. At that time, I had condemned the event in the strongest possible terms. These are terrorist actions and we’ll never agree with them. Afzal was never given a chance in the trial court, he was not given an opportunity to defend himself. It was a human rights violation that even the family wasn’t informed before he was hanged.

The execution was followed by a blanket curfew in Kashmir.

That is very obvious. India’s actions are so brutal that it is clear that she wants to remain in Kashmir on the basis of brute force. They do not want people to get their birthright, they do not want democracy and freedom to speak, write and travel. All our basic rights are being crushed. Before coming to Delhi in December 2012, I was kept under house-arrest for nine months in Kashmir. The same happened in 2011, 2010 and 2009. Even when my son-in-law Iftikhar’s father passed away, I wasn’t allowed to attend the funeral. I cannot attend wedding ceremonies of relatives. India’s attitude only shows their arrogance. Curfew is clamped and four youngsters have been killed.

You were at Jantar Mantar protesting Afzal Guru’s hanging. What were you demanding?
I was at Jantar Mantar to talk about India’s lapses. When I reached Srinagar on March 7, I was picked up at the airport and taken home, ostensibly for security reasons. There is a lot of official security at home. It’s a lame excuse to hide India’s brutality. What can I do if I am not allowed to meet my neighbour Afzal Guru from Sopore? I wanted to go to meet Tabassum beti to offer my condolences directly from the airport. It is my moral responsibility and right as a Muslim. Our demand is that Afzal’s dead body should be returned to the family since they can offer prayers as per ritual. It will bring a sense of satisfaction.

Did Omar Abdullah have a role?
Home Ministry had released a statement soon after the hanging which stated that “we have taken the Chief Minister of Jammu and Kashmir into confidence”. This means that the Chief Minister was taken in confidence well in advance. Now if he says we were not asked or we didn’t know anything, these are crocodile tears. Just like Farooq Abdullah had signed Maqbool Bhatt’s death warrant, Omar Abdullah is involved this time.

JKLF Chairman Yasin Malik shared stage with most-wanted terrorist Hafiz Saeed in Pakistan.
(laughing) This is an irrelevant question for me. No need to answer it.

I interviewed Hizbul Mujahideen commander Syed Salauddin in June last year. He said armed struggle in the valley will never stop. Hasn’t Kashmir seen enough bloodshed?
The responsibility of armed struggle of 1990 lies with India. They are not ready to resolve the dispute according to the commitments made through peaceful means. When you push a community to the wall, what is the alternative? If militancy and gun culture re-surface in Kashmir, the responsibility lies on the Indian government and not the people of Jammu and Kashmir. In 2008 and 2010, lakhs of people came out on the streets in protest but India took no notice. In 2010 an Indian parliamentary delegation came to seek commitment for talks. No one says no to talks. I am ready for talks but they have to be meaningful and result-oriented. That cannot happen till India agrees that Jammu and Kashmir is not a part of India and is a disputed territory. This should be followed by removal of armed forces and release of political prisoners. This will pave the way for talks. Otherwise we’ve had talked more than 150 times without any result. What is the alternative? Should we submit to the rule of the armed forces in Kashmir?


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2013.
An Initiative of IIPM, Malay Chaudhuri
For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles
2012 : DNA National B-School Survey 2012
Ranked 1st in International Exposure (ahead of all the IIMs)
Ranked 6th Overall

Zee Business Best B-School Survey 2012
Prof. Arindam Chaudhuri’s Session at IMA Indore
IIPM IN FINANCIAL TIMES, UK. FEATURE OF THE WEEK
IIPM strong hold on Placement : 10000 Students Placed in last 5 year
BBA Management Education

Wednesday, May 29, 2013

Castro'phic regime

Cuba needs to bring more transparency in its election process

Living in a world where elections have become a synonym of extravagant campaigns and corruption, the Republic of Cuba stands aside in the queue. However, following a single political party regime (Communist Party of Cuba) doesn't sound like a fruitful proposition anymore! All the candidates who stand for the national parliament get elected because of zero competition and when there is no competition, chances of bribery and corruption involved in the process of elections become zilch. The election procedure in Cuba is one of its kinds where there is no room for election campaigns and ads. Such acts are totally out of question in the country.

The on-going electoral process of Cuba has invited a lot of criticism both from outside the country and within. According to Guillermo Rodriguez, a revolutionary intellectual, “The citizen doesn’t have the option of choosing between one candidate or another. The most they can do is not vote for those they don’t like.” Moreover, many deputies are elected to represent places they haven’t lived in for decades – and in some cases, they’ve never lived there! The moot point is that when they haven’t been a part of the place they represent, how can they address the problems of their constituencies and needless to say, these problems will never be solved. To make matters worse, the image portrayed for decades has been that of a parliament that limits itself to unanimously “legalising” each of the measures announced by the executive. Cubans have never seen a deputy questioning a ministerial or executive report.

What catches our fancy is the fact that with only one political party, why make a mockery of elections and play around with the hopes of the citizens? Most important of all, why do people participate in the entire process and end up voting? It is believed that the pressure on the people is very high and if they don’t participate in the voting process then they are exposed to stringent actions by the Cuban government. Castro’s Communist regime trespasses on citizens' privacy rights and repudiates freedom of speech, press, assembly and association. The government limits the distribution of foreign publications and maintains strict censorship of news and information.

Cuba holds the general elections every five years but with the same procedure going on for years, the situation of the country is likely to deteriorate. However, a nation surrounded by powerful neighbours like the US who is leaving no stone unturned to break the existing regime of Cuba, the nation needs some degree of control over information flow and intelligence. But people should enjoy freedom and liberty. They will revolt for sure if they are deprived of the basic human rights for long – history is witness to this. There is dire need for free elections and concurrently there is a dire need for state-control on information flow. The choice is tough and the clock is ticking.


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2013.
An Initiative of IIPM, Malay Chaudhuri
For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles
2012 : DNA National B-School Survey 2012
Ranked 1st in International Exposure (ahead of all the IIMs)
Ranked 6th Overall

Zee Business Best B-School Survey 2012
Prof. Arindam Chaudhuri’s Session at IMA Indore
IIPM IN FINANCIAL TIMES, UK. FEATURE OF THE WEEK
IIPM strong hold on Placement : 10000 Students Placed in last 5 year
BBA Management Education

Tuesday, May 28, 2013

Book Review : Seven Deadly Sins

From hero to zero

Somewhere in the middle of this 430- page exposé of Lance Armstrong, journalist David Walsh recounts the story of his son, John, who died when he was all of twelve. Never afraid of asking questions and never holding anything so sacrosanct as to believe in it unquestionably, John once had a tiff with his teacher at his school. In the Bible class, where the nativity story was being recounted, his teacher insisted how Joseph and Mary lived a modest life. Confused and intrigued in equal parts, Walsh’s son shot back, “If they were so poor, what did they do with the gold they were given by the three wise men?” Heartbreaking as it might sound in retrospect, it tells us something about the Walsh family.

The Lance Armstrong saga can safely be adjudged as the biggest saga of triumph and eventual downfall in the history of sports in living memory. The story of a cyclist who fought and recovered from testicular cancer and went on to win a record seven Tour de France titles, and then followed it with a bestseller biography and a behemoth of a charitable organisation, appeared too good to be true to many. However, it needed immense courage to delve deeper. And one person who did that, David Walsh, the Irishman who works as the Sunday Times’ chief sports writer, found out that the going was tough. “He’s not the messiah, he’s a very naughty boy,” he had commented in his measured understatement. In unearthing the truth, he did one heck of a job. And, Seven Deadly Sins: My Pursuit Of Lance Armstrong is the product of that perseverance.

Completed a couple of months after the release of USADA’s ‘reasoned decision’ document that accused, with solid evidence, that Armstrong was the ringleader of “the most sophisticated, professionalised and successful doping program that sport has ever seen”, the book traces Walsh’s rather elongated and difficult pursuit to unearth what many say was the single biggest cover-up in the history of cycling.

Readers will benefit to know that this is not Walsh’s first book on this topic. It is his third. He has penned L.A. Confidential: The Secrets of Lance Armstrong and From Lance to Landis: Inside the American Doping Controversy at the Tour de France, both dealing with the same issue. However, it has not been easy to pursue this case. Because of stringent libel laws in the UK, the books attracted an unusual amount of litigation, a few leading to subpoena as well.

The book describes the troublesome period, including how it all started. Walsh admits that he was kind of soft in his early career, especially when he started covering Tour de France in 1982, partly because he loved the sport and partly because he loved the sportsmen, his compatriots, Sean Kelly and Stephen Roche. And since he was writing the biography of Sean Kelly, he chose to under-report the clear evidence of doping on Kelly’s part. Similarly, he was mighty impressed by Armstrong during his early stint and confessed that he wanted to like him.  “He had something inside that made him unlike any other young sportsman I had met. Radioactivity,” he writes.

However, something changed after the Michelle Smith controversy during Atlanta Olympics. When the ace swimmer was caught tampering with her urine sample after a splendid performance, Walsh and other journalists started to see performances more cynically. By the end of the decade, that cynicism grew into scepticism and the first sportsperson that caught his radar was Armstrong.

He was the first to report that Armstrong had worked with tainted Dr Ferrari. The report set the world against him. He was called names and variously referred by Armstrong, his entourage as well as the fraternity as a “fucking little troll” and “the worst journalist in the world”.

It was around this time that brought names like Paul Kimmage, Betsy Andreu, Greg LeMond, Pierre Ballester and Emma O’Reilly to the forefront and started building evidence against Armstrong.

Though at times it might appear vindictive, the book is a great work of investigative journalism that tested the limits of the writer’s credibility, conviction and more importantly perseverance. It is not without it flaws though. The later chapters appear to have been completed in haste.  Also, while much of the book is based on painstakingly gathered primary evidence, the last section is dependent mostly on secondary sources.

Read more.....

Source : IIPM Editorial, 2013.
An Initiative of IIPM, Malay Chaudhuri
For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles